Skip to content
Live nowSeason 2 Β· Episode 15 Β· Agentic Coding Guide
← Back to builds
Screenshot of Abomination

Abomination

by Auny 🧑

β˜… 3.5 (7)

Voted by β‚₯AN$A, Air Planes, Hovhannes Mkhitaryan, kaleb, rookepoole, Smiley β€œMakeShif”, Wil

Everyone opens the link and lands in a room that already exists β€” a code is generated for you, so the only thing it asks is your name. You get assigned a silly face you don't get to pick, and you're in the chat immediately. Then you confess. Twelve food crimes (pineapple on pizza, boneless wings, replying "k"), answered privately on your own phone, everyone at the same time. The second you finish, a bot called The Judge reads you out loud using only your own answers: "@AUNY objected to 11 of 12. A genuinely difficult person." You get roasted alone before you know anyone else's votes. Then the trial. One crime at a time, the split is revealed and the Judge names whoever stood alone: "Boneless wings. 7 said abomination. One did not. @SAM stands alone. Explain yourself." Everyone piles on in the chat. You can @ each other and @judge, and it answers from the real tally. After twelve crimes the screen flips from black void to bright paper and hands out four verdict cards: most cursed individual, insufferable purist, the one thing you all agreed on, and unlikely allies β€” two people who were alone together against the whole room and didn't know it. That last card is the actual icebreaker. You get there by arguing first. Then there's an arcade: snake, nerve (hold and release at exactly ten seconds, no clock) and reflex, all on one shared live leaderboard with the Judge calling the standings.

Models
Claude Opus 5
Cost
150k
Prompts & issues

The initial brief, roughly as I gave it: "has to be funny! i kinda wanna think in terms of red flags. people's red flags make people laugh β†’ if red flags are the 'ice breaker', people can then laugh about it, move past what they dont like about a person and relate on what they actually like. i'm thinking onboarding has a multiple choice interview on their red flags - funny dumb ones like pineapple on pizza... or shit like that. can take inspiration from some of these posts i had" The posts were my own "= Abomination" series, so the twelve crimes in the game are real ones people already argued with me about. After that the direction came in pieces as I watched it come together. We can't build the same UI we had yesterday β€” use a mix of my Schitzo, Negative Space and Sketchy art styles instead. We should have a chat room built in so we can all enter and chat. Put an AI bot in there too, and people and the bot can tag each other. The build can't be a static thing, it has to be a live site, could just be a git site. The background should be animated and interactive to mouse movements, and add tiny design elements like graphics and clip arts that add a personal touch. Joining shouldn't have any gates β€” if someone's on the link they can chat, just ask for their name, assign a random room code by default, and randomly give everyone a silly pfp. Then add three mini games people can play after the icebreaker is complete, simple ones, like snake or some kind of spacebar game everyone can play together. And the copy fix that mattered most: "twelve food crimes" made no sense as a headline. It named the content instead of telling you what to do. "Confess your crimes" does.